A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out amongst prospective neighbours above the development of the wall in a coastal web page in the north Dublin suburb, a scenario which has attracted national interest subsequent an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed loved ones dwelling at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of organizing breaches, environmental concerns, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier and also the Irish Moments article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as an area disagreement has advanced into a highly publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of building will work at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and an organization director respectively, seek to build their spouse and children property. The case is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Eire’s coastline, in which growth pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of set up citizens. Based on the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being built by their prospective neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted below scheduling authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those inhabitants of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions in their planning authorization by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their site, resulting in an encroachment on the Distinctive Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as such regions are subject to stringent controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Of their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have Long lasting ecological consequences, specifically in a delicate coastal setting which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their arranging permission, and say the wall, which happens to be partially developed, is in the proper place. Their lawful crew has characterised the action being an attempt to hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding so that you can preserve their perspective, an allegation which has been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal setting up disputes, where by sights of The ocean are equally extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable efforts through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the website, In line with sworn proof referenced from the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded by waist-higher drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the location Irish Occasions, a picture that has considering the fact that grow to be emblematic of the intensity on the dispute. These steps weren't merely symbolic; they were being meant to Acquire Visible evidence with the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location through the sea Irish Situations claimed, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the drinking water all through significant weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm h2o to photograph the website grew to become Probably the most striking descriptions to arise from courtroom reporting. The Irish Occasions report about accountant Paul Feely observed that these actions ended up cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception the wall extended into a place afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was staying encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been coated in detail via the national push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 grew to become broadly searched phrases as readers sought to comprehend the history and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court read even more submissions on no matter if interim orders must be granted to halt building pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important second during the legal timeline.
On the Main with the dispute is really a disagreement above boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as constructed, goes past what was authorized and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has become described as meticulous in his assessment of setting up documents, maps, and disorders connected for the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally pressured that their action is inspired by worry for environmental security and adherence to preparing legislation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving a private see, insisting instead that it's about making sure that progress at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have got explained their extended-standing connection to the area and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a few only attempting to produce a spouse and children household in accordance With all the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches with a Distinctive Place of Conservation and say that each one operates have already been carried out determined by Qualified assistance and accredited programs. Their lawyers have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes entering the sea all through a storm, will not alter the fundamental specifics.
The situation has also lifted broader questions about how scheduling disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute about design of wall at coastal website has grown to be a shorthand description Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 for just a predicament that numerous observers see as more and more widespread. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation amongst personal land, public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Moments write-up about René Collier famous which the businessman had Formerly been associated with community advocacy on setting up and environmental challenges, nevertheless not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from incredibly different Expert backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous While using the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site within the sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waist-higher water in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by means of waist-large h2o during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in coverage, reflecting equally the physical reality of your coastline as well as symbolic nature of the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these actions shown commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an too much strategy.
As the High Court proceedings continue on, the end result stays unsure. The court docket ought to figure out whether or not the wall as crafted complies with organizing authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment into a Special Space of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and scheduling disorders. Still the human aspect continues to be central: neighbours who have to live alongside each other prolonged following the authorized costs are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over development will work at the site on Dublin Road, Sutton, but the implications of the case lengthen over and above that deal with. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition it underscores how immediately an area disagreement can escalate when basic problems including environmental protection and home legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of purely natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre of your dispute stands partly constructed, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal queries. Whether it is going to finally be altered, eradicated, or completed as prepared will count on the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will probable continue on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent years.